" And it can be much faster than btrfs, especially with lots of smaller files. What we mean is that we need something like resize2fs (ext4) for enlarge or shrunk on the fly, and not required to use another filesystem to store the dump for the resizing. 4 EXT4 / XFS / Btrfs RAID Performance On Four HDDs Storage : 2019-12-28: Benchmarking The Experimental Bcachefs File-System Against Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS & ZFS Storage : 2019-06-25: Optane SSD RAID Performance With ZFS On Linux, EXT4, XFS, Btrfs, F2FS Storage : 2019-06-20: Linux 5. For the data drive, personally, I have stuck. The logical path from Ext4 is to Btrfs. If you are running a more stable system like Dabian based Linux EXT4 is a better choice because it's faster file system but not as easy to revert. XFS vs Btrfs. XFS A number of Phoronix readers have been asking about some fresh file-system comparisons on recent kernels. Its not faster or more stable then the other two. because it spans multiple partitions, it's less likely to fill up your hard drive. EXT4 being the “safer” choice of the two, it is by the most commonly used FS in linux based systems, and most applications are developed and tested on EXT4. If it is only about reliability and you're in doubt, go with ext4, imho. . ZFS & BTRFS (and maybe BCACHEFS) present an entirely new and generally superior paradigm. The SATA 3. buying used laptops with older ssd vs a new one. EXT4 has entirely different design goals, none of which are data integrity. The total throughput is better than with ZFS (40k vs 60k), but the jitter is more severe. Main features: Data protection features, including snapshot, replication, and point-in-time recovery. Tl;dr: The best filesystem for Unraid. For single disks over 4T, I would consider xfs over zfs or ext4. I did this to all of my partitions, including home. one of the still “beta” features of btrfs. As well as btrfs. It takes a second to snapshot, and deletes of a snapshotted tree what takes ext4 26 hours is a few minutes on btrfs. I do use f2fs on all of my Raspberry Pi SD cards where it gives a huge performance boost over btrfs or ext4. The way you describe this workload, I think it is not very demanding. I've seen benchmarks (eg: this one) that put btrfs considerably slower than ext4. Let’s go through the different features of the two filesystems. But again, there's no real point in going with btrfs if only using two drives. Some think of the B-tree file system as a better, more modern alternative to ext4. All my systems (4) have been using BTRFS for some time now without any issues. It also wasn't formatted with -m finobt=1 which is a game-changer for XFS performance with small files and heavy metadata updates. While looking at the filesystem options it seems like BTRFS is a lot more stable than it was the last time I had to install arch so now I am seriously considering using it. However ZFS does come at one major downside, it needs more resources in just about every way one can imagine, ZFS is best with more disks, more RAM, more CPU, more Bandwidth, more SSD’s for caching…. Die Funktionen umfassen eine transparente Komprimierung, Prüfsummen und. It is destined to be replaced by Btrfs as the default Linux filesystem. What takes up space is each consecutive data change, that is why snapshots are created instantaneously. This article provides a detailed comparison of the three file systems to help you decide which one is the best for your needs. See moreWith not having the time to conduct the usual kernel version vs. Choosing between them can be difficult as each has its own advantages and disadvantages. 0. But according to tests in all scenarios, XFS is better than EXT4, it's a pity that there are no tests in games. 多设备的集成卷管理 Expand section "6. Обзор Ext4 vs Btrfs vs XFS. Out of Ext4 or btrfs, I would chose btrfs with the snapshots. - Linux Kernel 5. I have a raid 1 setup on dual 3. Considering that the btrfs will be able for spanning over the multiple hard drives, it is a very good thing that it can support 16 times more drive space than the ext4. Note that everything with LVM is at the block level which has major limitations. X percent… The more modern filesystems of BTRFS and ZFS not only have data integrity features but also the inline compression pushes the efficiency past 100% in many cases. These days the system is more refined with Dalto’s Btrfs Assistant. It can hold up to 1 billion terabytes of data. EXT4 is very low-hassle, normal journaled filesystem. Hey Guys! Welcome to XPSTECH. FreeBSD has ports you can install that will allow data transfer of some linux file systems. ago. Btrfs trails the other options for a database in terms of latency and throughput. ext4 can claim historical stability, while the consumer advantage of btrfs is snapshots (the ease of subvolumes is nice too, rather than having to partition). When running PostMark, ZFS came out far ahead of the UFS file-systems being more than ten times faster than. Picking a filesystem is not really relevant on a Desktop computer. This correlates with the previous experiment and the hypothesis. But I would still refrain from using it on the deck due to the case folding trouble. 0 NVMe SSD was used for the benchmarking of these file-systems in different desktop use-cases. Downside is that it's a slower file system due to it's nature of redundancy. XFS is very well established and changing slowly, and the same can be said for EXT4. With not having the time to conduct the usual kernel version vs. BtrFS is still very experimental and is not recommended for a production server or desktop environment. 7 - Btrfs vs. F2FS vs. F2FS vs. also XFS has been recommended by many for MySQL/MariaDB for some time. all kinds for nice features (like extents, subsecond timestamps) which ext3 does not have. XFS vs. Regarding filesystems. Btrfs Benchmarks comparison, here is a wider look at mainline file-systems on the Linux 4. In this episode of the CyberGizmo I benchmark the 4 filesystems chosen by Phoronix for his testing and use my own workloads to compare and contrast them. The only benefit of btrfs that I could find was marginally easier setup and the software license. e. To be clear, I am using RAID0 with two SSDs with strip size of 256Kb. これらのファイルシステムはEXT4、Btrfs、ZFSであり、XNUMXつのファイルシステムは異なる特性を持ち、いくつかは異なるシナリオでより優れたパフォーマンスを発揮します。 外部4. Improve this answer. Things like snapshots, copy-on-write, checksums and more. 특히 시놀로지에서는 데이터 보호와 백업의 용이함을 장점으로 내세운 Btrfs를 권장합니다. XFS. I've never had an issue with either, and currently run btrfs + luks. Ext4 focuses on providing a reliable and stable file system with good performance. XFS is spectacularly fast during both the insertion phase and the workload execution. Use XFS for your array drives and Btrfs for your cache pool. Tl;dr: The best filesystem for Unraid. But yeah, it's (BTRFS) a more complex filesystem with a bottomless pit of asterisks and gotchas attached to it, EXT4 is much more limited in scope and much simpler from a design perspective. In a few words, I just need a really reliable and fast filesystem for years ahead, with the care of SSD in mind, I need it mostly for gaming, video-audio production, working with a lot of small/medium files (from 100-500Kb to 100-150Gb) sending them. provides. These days the system is more refined with Dalto’s Btrfs Assistant. The Ext4 file system is a very old file system and it has been used on the Linux operating system for a long, long time. Use xfs_info to verify that the ftype option is set to 1. With Bcachefs core development being done and the possibility of this file-system being mainlined soon, here are some fresh benchmarks of this file-system compared to Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and ZFS On Linux. Looking at benchmarks however it seems to have poor. XFS is a robust and mature 64-bit journaling file system that supports very large files and file systems on a single host. 2. BTRFS VS EXT4 performance in Raid 1. Approach 2: Readjust things so the kernel and modules are on an ext4 filesystem and the data you most want to compress is on a btrfs partition. BTRFS was clearly in the lead when considering Documents – even better than ZFS with deduplication. 另外，我们常说的file对象，它用于关联进程和dentry对象的. As for filesystems, not sure I'd bother considering JFS since I believe it may be deprecated out of the kernel soon. 0 hard drive when using EXT4 and XFS. Sure, BtrFS has its benefits and novel features, but "has never once failed me in 10+ years" is an incredibly strong reliability trend that I'd be hesitant to trade for those, especially in a piece of my infrastructure where a single failure could potentially cause massive loss of data and subsequent time spent recovering from backups/etc. 4 EXT4 / XFS / Btrfs RAID Performance On Four HDDs Storage : 2019-12-28: Benchmarking The Experimental Bcachefs File-System Against Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS & ZFS Storage : 2019-06-25: Optane SSD RAID Performance With ZFS On Linux, EXT4, XFS, Btrfs, F2FS Storage : 2019-06-20: Linux 5. But… Some different plus for BTRFS Backup is about data safety. To mount the XFS file system so that it uses the external journal, specify the -o logdev=device option to the. Let's go over File Systems in this video. It is intended to compete with the modern features of ZFS or Btrfs, and the speed and performance of ext4 or XFS. XFS vs. Ext4 - очень стабильная файловая система, которая была выбрана по. ext4 was supposed to be a stop gap until a better Linux filesystem came along. How do the major file systems supported by Linux differ from each other? Compared to Ext4, XFS has a relatively poor performance for single threaded, metadata-intensive workloads. I was using NTFS due to compatibility. Hello everyone, The time has come again for me to reinstall arch once more. Each of these relies on the backing filesystem being configured correctly. The reason that Ext4 is often recommended is that it is the most used and trusted filesystem out there on Linux today. EXT4 being the “safer” choice of the two, it is by the most commonly used FS in linux based systems, and most applications are developed and tested on EXT4. 11. XFS as a similar featureset filesystem manages around 99. This is because BTRFS is optimized for handling small files, while EXT4 can struggle with multiple small files due to its delayed allocation. Compared to ext4, XFS has unlimited inode allocation, advanced allocation hinting (if you need it) and, in recent version, reflink support (but they need. ext4 is not recommended. The only time there were issues was when my RAM sticks went bad and btrfs detected it and put my FS into read-only mode to prevent corruption. 2. Crypto2. 7 - Btrfs vs. After a week of testing Btrfs on my laptop, I can conclude that there is a noticeable performance penalty vs Ext4 or XFS. Both timeshift and borg write to it. 88. To be clear, I am using RAID0 with two SSDs with strip size of 256Kb. Each of these file systems has its own way of organizing data, merits, and demerits. 3. Here are the major feature of BTFS over ext4. XFS. Thanks again! Unless you're doing something crazy, ext4 or btrfs would both be fine. 4 HDD RAID performance per his request with Btrfs, EXT4, and XFS while using consumer HDDs and an AMD Ryzen APU setup that could work out for a NAS type low-power system for anyone else that may be interested. EXT4 vs. After much reading on ReFS, Btrfs, & ZFS, I've decided to run all 3 🤷♂️(Did the same with Seagate vs. And generally, files that arent compressible, wont be forcefully compressed. Yes Ext4 is much easier to setup but BTRFS has its advantages. Ext4 and xfs are very stable, I prefer xfs with the only downside I've found you can't shrink a partition. . The 3 types of file systems support large file size and volume size. XFS scales much better on modern multi-threaded workloads. . ext4 with m=0 ext4 with m=0 and T=largefile4 xfs with crc=0 mounted them with: defaults,noatime defaults,noatime,discard defaults,noatime results show really no difference between first two, while plotting 4 at a time: time is around 8-9 hours. It was time to do my quarterly disaster recovery drill, which involves bootstrapping my entire system from scratch using my scripts and backups. 3. It you have huge hard drives, BTRFS supports up to 16 times larger size than 1 EXT4 partition. So với Ext4, Btrfs hoạt động ổn đinh hơn, dễ dàng quản lý hơn và tích hợp nhiều ứng dụng hỗ trợ tốt cho doanh nghiệp Quy mô lớn. FYI: btrfs. 3 which makes XFS v5 the default and all the benefits it brings. Why? Files are the most important bits of data on your hard drive. F2FS With Linux 4. On the other hand, for Linux/Unix-based devices, it might be a bit of a challenge choosing one among many options. 5. 500GB HDD formatted as NTFS for luks containers. The XFS supports more file sizes and greater file or partition sizes. creating volumes and mounting them would need to check that option and decide on appropriate mount points. This article provides a detailed comparison of XFS vs btrfs to help you determine which file system is a better fit for your use case. XFS与Ext4性能比较. Ext4 has journaling on by default, and new users likely won’t know how to disable it to save read/writes on their SSDs. I suggest to give the arch wiki a read to get an overview what btrfs provides and where it’s limited in comparison to other solutions. There was obviously some caching / lack of committing to disk involved that led to faster performance while the Btrfs file-system was in line with real-world expectations out of the. Both Btrfs and Ext4 have their own advantages. The XFS file system is loved in the Linux community for its ability to handle and manage significant. You will see the difference especially with autosaves in Satisfactory for an example. In this Video we are going to cover Linux File System Types - Ext2,Ext3,Ext4,XFS,BTRFS | Linux File Systems Explained | Linux Tutorial for Beginners #linuxt. BTRFS also had somewhat higher latency than EXT4, meaning that it took longer for files to be accessed on the file system. For btrfs you have to do most from CLI. En el caso de los servidores NAS de Synology, tenemos la posibilidad de configurar EXT4 o Btrfs, de hecho, en el asistente de configuración de los volúmenes podremos elegir entre uno y otro sin ningún problema. I was using NTFS due to compatibility. XFS. 但无论如何，各个文件系统都需要存储这三类信息，因为这是内核规定的（见下）。. I think in many ways btrfs is the better filesystem, but I seem to have noticed that it takes longer to copy data than on ext4. Bảo vệ dữ liệu. 불가능. Both are good file systems. Btrfs is slower, especially on non-SSDs, because of CoW, but has a whole lot more going on under the hood in way of features and data integrity. The Ext4 file system is a very old file system and it has been used on the Linux operating system for a long, long time. 3. btrfs seems to write more data to a disk than ext4. 0 SSD drive used was a 250GB Samsung 850 PRO solid-state drive connected both. ) and if/how to preallocate metadata etc. Pros: Individual file size: 16GB to 2TB. You can hot swap drives without rebooting, remove failed drives, swap in a larger drive and remove the smaller one, all without preparing ahead of time to do so. The XFS supports more file sizes and greater file or partition sizes. BtrFS looked promising, but last I checked it still couldn't be trusted in RAID modes. And you might just as well use EXT4. Overview of File Systems in Linux. Ext4 file system is the successor to Ext3, and the mainstream file system under Linux. ran btrfs balance to balance all btrfs volumes. With not having the time to conduct the usual kernel version vs. Never use ReiserFS on a new system and if you are currently using it, consider converting it to XFS or Btrfs. 4. Indie games often too get fair amount of gain. No such built-in compression support is in Ext4. webbphillips • 8 mo. 其實你提到一個重點了. /boot/efi has to be FAT32 (assuming you are using it as the ESP and not just adding partitions extra partitions under /boot to test how robust the boot sequence is). #filesystem #ext4 #xfs #linuxExplicación de las diferencias entre sistemas de archivos, en este vídeo se comparan los 2 mas usados en GNU/Linux. • 3 mo. So if you are after the most speed for the buck and if your NAS is already doing RAID 5 or more, you could go for Ext4. Main features: Data protection features, including snapshot, replication, and point-in-time recovery. The XFS File System. Support for large file sizes - The Ext4 supports a single file size of up to 16 TiB ( Tebibytes ) whereas XFS supports a max file size of up to 8 exbibytes. 2. Este vídeo muestra el rendimiento de los sistemas de archivos mas usados en un entorno muy parecido al que se encuentra en producción en servidores de archiv. I've heard good things about BTRFS, and I'd use XFS but I dislike that it takes an significant % of the free-space off the bat. Data integrity protection. are two different decisions you have to make. XFS vs. zfs not. I use ext4 everywhere. 创建 btrfs 文件系统 6. All have pros and cons. EXT4 vs. 1. No compression, but compaction. It's not the fastest but not exactly a slouch. But I was more talking to the XFS vs EXT4 comparison. With not having the time to conduct the usual kernel version vs. ) XFS. Optane SSD RAID Performance With ZFS On Linux, EXT4, XFS, Btrfs, F2FS Storage : 2019-06-20: FreeBSD ZFS vs. A maximum partition size of the btrfs file system is 16 exbibytes, as well as maximum file size is 16 exbibytes too. In the time since I chose ext4 for these systems, btrfs seems to have come a long way, so the choice may be harder today. Ext4 파일 시스템. Server with complex storage needs including redundancy and you need high uptime, and you have the budget. User quotas for each shared folder. 7. Btrfs（技术预览）" 6. EXT4: Alternative File Systems for Linux Operating Systems. Btrfs is not a successor to the default Ext4 file system used in most Linux distributions, but it can be expected to replace Ext4 in the future. Như vậy, chúng ta có thể dễ dàng kết hợp các phân vùng định dạng Ext2, Ext3 và Ext4 trong cùng 1 ổ đĩa trong Ubuntu để tăng hiệu suất hoạt động. This is the number of data disks times the number of blocks per. Both Btrfs and Ext4 have their own advantages. BTRFS is a filesystem with an architecture and a set of features that are similar to ZFS and with a GPL license. Just EXT4, yes. ZFS is an advanced filesystem and many of its features focus mainly on reliability. 15 Comparing KPTI/Retpoline. Various internet sources suggest that XFS is faster and better, but taking into account that they also suggest that EXT4 is. The thing is I'm putting /home in a separate HDD. Nowadays btrfs is very stable and the tools to recover from fs corruption have been getting much better as well. ext4 with m=0 ext4 with m=0 and T=largefile4 xfs with crc=0 mounted them with: defaults,noatime defaults,noatime,discard defaults,noatime results show really no difference between first two, while plotting 4 at a time: time is around 8-9 hours. Tính năng tự khôi phục tập tin. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. Được tích hợp vô hệ thống DSM Synology , do NAS có hiệu xuất làm việc cao trong vấn đề lưu trữ và khôi phục, Btrfs hoạt động trên NAS. I converted my ext4 disks (3 x ssd + 1 x hdd) to btrfs, and all was well. The snapshots do not take up any space. ZFS certainly can provide higher levels of growth and resiliency vs ext4/xfs. 500GB HDD formatted as NTFS for luks containers. Ext3 and Ext4 perform better on limited bandwidth (< 200MB/s) and up to ~1,000 IOPS capability. ZFS vs EXT4 vs BTRFS File Systems Perhaps these types of file systems are strange or unknown to you, normal, since they are used in the environment of servers, NAS and Linux systems in general. 1. /boot/efi has to be FAT32 (assuming you are using it as the ESP and not just adding partitions extra partitions under /boot to test how robust the boot sequence is). I developed an application recently and compared the I/O performance of both and found ext4 to be slightly quicker for my application which was really just opening and reading whole files into memory. Since then I have come to value tooling about as much as performance. Depending on why you want btrfs, you could run zfs. Linux provides the statx(2) system call interface for retrieving the file birth time for filesystems that support it since kernel version 4. 再將資料再回存到 NAS, 這部份會花費很多時間. In most cases that’s EXT4, but for Fedora, OpenSuse and maybe a few others it’s btrfs. XFS still has some reliability issues, but could be good for a large data store where speed matters but rare data loss (e. Btrfs' RAID on Linux 5. Btrfs was 107% faster in initial read scores and 24% faster in initial write scores. LVM takes a set of block devices and presents the system with a new (LV) block device with a fixed mapping to physical blocks. wiki. Boot from an install CD, then convert by doing: # btrfs-convert /dev/ partition. sorry, i got that second sentence wrong. The use of checksums in Btrfs can prevent silent data corruption. Back when Bcachefs debuted in 2015 I ran some initial. "Open-source" is the primary reason people pick Btrfs over the competition. Granted, i just use the automatic partition creater at setup, so it still uses ext4 for the /boot and /boot/efi partitions. The stock mount options were used for all of the testing. petronasAMG77 • 1 yr. Hi I never worry about it… my latest SSD SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB has a 10 (limited) year 50GB a day warranty, Have OCZ’s with thousands of hours running btrfs all running fine. - No RAID. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. How do the major file systems supported by Linux differ from each other?Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS were tested in their out-of-the-box state / default mount options. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system benchmarks on a speedy WD_BLACK SN850 NVMe solid-state drive. If you're looking to warehouse big blobs of data or lots of archive and reporting; then by all means ZFS is a great choice. On multi-drive systems, the opposite might be true, zfs outperforming ext4. Have snapper to create pre/post BTRFS and LVM snapshots. In terms of XFS vs Ext4, XFS is superior to Ext4 in the following. Ext4 has some scalability and performance issues when dealing with large or fragmented files or directories. Running this fio command, I get about 2. BTRFS is an actual file-system. Nhân bản toàn bộ Share. 4. Quota journaling: This avoids the need for lengthy quota consistency checks after a crash. Btrfs come with compression algorithms present in the filesystem, allowing data to be compressed at the filesystem level right when written to the system. Uma das decisões que você tem que tomar quando vai instalar qualquer distro Linux é o Sistema de arquivos do Linux! São vários para escolher, EXT4, XFS e BTR. Btrfs (pronounced as Butter FS, Better FS, or B-Tree FS) Considering that the btrfs will be able for spanning over the multiple hard drives, it is a very good poit that it can support 16 times more drive space than the ext4. In a significant data corruption, Ext2 and Ext3 file systems are more possible and easy to recover data due to their data redundancy compared with Ext4. Neither of the filesystems is better supported by OMV4 or OMV5. But. BTRFS bietet, mal abgesehen von der Möglichkeit einer Inline Deduplizierung, beinahe alle Features von ZFS. #filesystem #ext4 #xfs #linuxExplicación de las diferencias entre sistemas de archivos, en este vídeo se comparan los 2 mas usados en GNU/Linux. Or when it came to testing the single Seagate IronWolf 6TB HDD performance, Btrfs and EXT4 were performing about the same with a. But not enough users follow the guide on and instead do stuff that actually makes the system worse. Latency for both XFS and EXT4. F2FS vs. brown2green. the mirrored pairs would be much faster for both reads and writes. I've heard good things about BTRFS, and I'd use XFS but I dislike that it takes an significant % of the free-space off the bat. 드라이브 압축. now i would do ext4 and btrfs instead of ReiserFS and JFS. But to be honest, it might be easier for me to work around than the lack of the possibility for single-file clone that btrfs, XFS etc. The XFS one on the other hand take around 11-13 hours!With Bcachefs on its trek towards the mainline Linux kernel, this week I conducted some benchmarks using the very latest Bcachefs file-system code and compared its performance to the mainline Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system competitors on both rotating and solid-state storage. However, BTRFS had significantly better performance with small files than EXT4. Linux EXT4/Btrfs RAID With Twenty SSDs Storage :. 356 Btrfs—short for "B-Tree File System" and frequently pronounced "butter" or "butter eff ess"—is the most advanced filesystem present in the mainline Linux kernel. It supports large file systems and provides excellent scalability and reliability. Silent data corruption, sometimes referred to as bitrot, is more. 4. So it has no barring. EXT4 vs. Mount ntfs drives only read only. Offizieller Beitrag. Ability to shrink filesystem. But. For reducing the size of a filesystem, there are two purported wats forward, according to xfs developers. XFS on the other hand is older, so more "mature. EXT4. In my second round I made setups with btrfs on the nvme SSD and luks+btrfs on 2TB HDD as RAID1. Linux File System Comparison: XFS vs. Januar 2020. That was many years ago, perhaps when btrfs was less ready. Btrfs El sistema de archivos Btrfs nació como sucesor natural de EXT4, su objetivo es sustituirlo eliminando el mayor número de sus limitaciones, sobre todo lo referido al tamaño. to add to the confusion: one actually could use btrfs to act like some sort of raid ;-) I would not use btrfs for that anyway. And I don't know if btrfs is right thing for my server. After a week of testing Btrfs on my laptop, I can conclude that there is a noticeable performance penalty vs Ext4 or XFS. 迄今为止，对于桌面系统而言，ext4 似乎是一个更好的选择，因为它是默认的文件系统，传输文件时也比 btrfs 更快。. Reliable! I used it in Rsync mode as only my backup disk is btrfs, everything else was ext4 or XFS. you don't have to think about what you're doing because it's what. BTRFS was clearly in the lead when considering Documents – even better than ZFS with deduplication. In some areas Btrfs was showing great improvements in performance, especially for the RAID setup, but it still lacked in some other areas. Bcachefs is the file-system born out of the Linux kernel's block cache code and has been worked on the past several years by. The Ext4 File System. In the end I use ext4 as trustworthy frontend, and btrfs as a unreliable backup. I used XFS until I managed to corrupt my partition table (my fault not XFS'). The most commonly used are Ext4, Btrfs, XFS, and ZFS which is the most recent file system released back in 2018. As others have said, btrfs is newer and offers a few advanced features for backups (snapshots) and data integrity. Ceph's recommendation for the choice of filesystem is between btrfs and XFS. EXT3 이후 나온 EXT4는 기존 버전보다 안정성은 향상이 되었지만 범용성과. 0-040700-generic (x86_64) Unity 7. However, if you are looking for a. ext4 is an "advanced" version of ext3 with various improvements, basically an upgrade to the ext3 format. use ZFS only w/ ECC RAM. 여러 가지의 HDD를 장착하여 사용을 하신다면 사진이나 중요한 자료들을 저장하는 드라이브에는. - no encryption. 7. So for a large video collection, I think I will stick with ext4 still. This includes workload that creates or deletes large numbers of small files in a single thread. Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS were tested in their out-of-the-box state / default mount options. I would stick with ext4 for the OS. F2FS vs. If you omit the size parameter, a journal size based on the size of the file system is used. Btrfs removes duplicate data from disk directly while Ext4 cannot do that, Btrfs support CoW so users can create writable and read-only. Ext4 is a journaled filesystem, which simply means that it “journals” the location of the files on the disk and keeps track of the changes on the disk. mount the recently formatted btrfs partition without special options just with mount /dev/nvme0n1p2 /mnt and create the subvolumes you want, e. . 4TB HDD formatted as NTFS for backuping all other three hard disks. Interestingly ZFS is amazing for. It has features that can scale better than ext4 and is even preferred over ZFS by some users. 38. Running AIO-Stress on the Western Digital VelociRaptor was yielding speeds not technically possible for the Serial ATA 3. Through many years of development, it is one of the most stable file systems. XFS is a robust and mature 64-bit journaling file system that supports very large files and file systems on a single host.